5585 Spring Mountain Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89146
702-754-6774

West Virginia Rules DFS Game of Skill; No it’s Not, Says Delaware

West Vi<span id="more-12000"></span>rginia Rules DFS Game of Skill; No it’s Not, Says Delaware

Delaware AG Matthew Denn’s opinion it is DFS is a not a game of skill. At the very least, it is not the real way we play it!

Western Virginia and Delaware are two states that do not have plans to legalize daily fantasy sports in the future, and for two very different reasons. Two attorneys general, 400 miles aside, have actually demonstrated two different opinions on the legality for the contests over the past days that are few.

On Monday, western Virginia’s AG ruled that there was no need to legalize DFS because it was prominently a game of skill and therefore perfectly legal under West Virginia law.

‘We read state law to prohibit only betting upon games decided at least predominantly by chance,’ penned Morrisey in his viewpoint. But DFS, he said ‘are determined predominantly by skill, knowledge, and athletic performance.’

Whether western Virginia will now move to regulate and tax the DFS industry, as its neighbor Virginia became the initial US state to complete at the start of the season, is of course a matter for the legislature.

Delaware Pulls the Plug

In stark contrast, Delaware pulled the plug on DFS the other day, with its AG, Matthew Denn, ruling, perhaps more controversially, that the contests had been just about games of chance.

‘Relying in the Delaware Constitution, as well as State and Federal case law, DOJ attorneys determined that online fantasy contests that involve payment for playing and financial rewards constitute gambling because chance, compared to experience, is the dominant aspect in the outcome of these contests,’ said Denn.

‘The most skilled participants might lose much less skilled participants might win because of exactly what actually occurs during the real-life game. In other words, real-life players are human being and behavior that is human unpredictable.

‘While it is acknowledged that specific individuals may use their particular sports knowledge in selecting their fantasy players and otherwise participating such contests, that factor alone does not make the contests games of skill.’

Precursor to Regulation?

Denn said that he had written cease and desist letters to DFS sites operating in Delaware, including DraftKings, FanDuel and Yahoo. There has been no formal statement from any operator on the problem, nor any indication of whether they intend to comply.

Of course, the AG’s ruling would not preclude the legislature from passing a law to legalize and control DFS as time goes by; indeed, similar rulings from DA’s in other states have shown become a catalyst for the passing legislation that is such as was the case in Tennessee and Mississippi earlier this year.

A bill to manage DFS was introduced into the Delaware home at zero hour at the finish of the session that is legislative 30 June, but could was too late be pushed through.

‘We are certain that many Delaware residents and visitors would enjoy participating in the full array of fantasy activities contests, including those that require payment for participation and have cash awards,’ concluded Genn. ‘But until such contests can be offered legally, the DOJ must enforce the law.’

RAWA Champion Chaffetz Grills AG Lynch, While Sanders Shocks with Clinton Endorsement

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) was back at it on Capitol Hill this week, as the congressman continues to demand answers in regards to the FBI’s suggestion to your Department of Justice (DOJ) not to prosecute Democratic contender that is presidential Clinton.

On July 6, FBI Director James Comey stated Clinton’s usage of an email that is private while serving as secretary of state was careless, but did not warrant unlawful costs.

US Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) seen here at an earlier hearing using the FBI’s James Comey, grilled AG Loretta Lynch at a House Judiciary Commitee hearing on Tuesday concerning the legalities surrounding Hillary Clinton’s claims about her private email server usage. Lynch largely avoided taking any stance whatsoever, visibly irritating Chaffetz. Representative Elijah Cummings (D- Maryland) sits to Chaffetz’ right. (Image: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

Chaffetz is Las Vegas Sands Chairman Sheldon Adelson’s right-hand man in Congress. The representative introduced the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in the homely house to coincide with Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-South Carolina) legislation in the Senate.

RAWA seeks to revive the Wire Act to its pre-2011 interpretation. Five years back, the DOJ issued a viewpoint saying the Wire Act applied just to online sports betting, effortlessly starting states to legalize online casinos.

Chaffetz believes the DOJ had no right to unilaterally overhaul law that is federal. He also doesn’t believe the department is being candid in how it’s responding to Comey’s findings.

Pleading the Fifth

The morning after his agency recommended no charges against Clinton for storing classified emails on non-secure servers, Comey came across with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, of which Chaffetz is the president.

Although he didn’t have the true luxury of as much interview time as he did with Comey, Chaffetz did his best to take complete benefit of the five minutes he previously with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Tuesday. As AG, Lynch is technically Comey’s boss, while the FBI is just a division associated with DOJ.

But Lynch deflected one question after another, much towards the chagrin of the Utah congressman. The AG avoided giving answers that are specific Chaffetz’ ongoing attack of ‘can it be legal or illegal?’

‘ Is it legal or illegal to talk about classified information with somebody who doesn’t have security clearance?’ the congressman asked Lynch. ‘Is it legal or unlawful to offer use of somebody who doesn’t have the security that is requisite to view classified material? Can it be legal or illegal to store, house, or retain classified information in a non-secure location?’

When Lynch regularly and repeatedly referred him to ‘statutes’ to clarify the standing that is legal some of these issues, Chaffetz’ frustration was numerous and unhidden.

‘The lack of quality you give to this body is pretty that is stunnin . . My time has expired, I wish we had about 20 more minutes,’ he noted.

Sanders Endorses Clinton

Using the email scandal ( at the least legally) behind her, Hillary Clinton has now gotten the formal nod from her previous nemesis in Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.

‘Secretary Clinton has won the Democratic nomination,’ Sanders said in New Hampshire, standing alongside the previous secretary of state and First Lady. ‘I mean to do everything I could to make certain she will be the president that is next of United States.’

Republican nominee Donald Trump countered the announcement by instantly releasing an advertising showcasing the various times Sanders said Clinton had been unfit to be president.

Bush and Obama Unite, for One Brief Shining Minute

Meanwhile, a uncommon moment of unity between your political parties emerged on July 12 in Dallas. Within a memorial service for the slain police officers ambushed on July 7, President Barack Obama and former President George W. Bush came together in an attempt to honor those killed by way of a crazed anti-law, anti-white gunman in an attack that is sniper

Obama told mourners, ‘As Americans, we can decide that people like this killer will fail ultimately. They shall not drive us apart. We can decide to come together and make our country mirror the good we share. inside us, the hopes and easy ambitions’

Before Obama, Bush discussed the selflessness of police officers everywhere.

‘Most of us suppose if the moment called for it, we would risk our everyday lives to protect a spouse or a kid,’ the former president said. ‘Those wearing the uniform assume that danger for the safety of strangers [at all times].’

Further feedback about gun control and the Black Lives question movement throughout the service from Obama received criticism from some segments, nevertheless, with numerous saying it absolutely was not the right destination or time to address politically loaded issues.

Pennsylvania Online Gambling Bill Shelved Until Legislature Reconvenes This Autumn

Billionaire and gambling that is anti-Internet Sheldon Adelson is likely happy to master Pennsylvania online gambling will be delayed until at least the fall. (Image: Associated Press/ haaretz.com)

Pennsylvania online gambling will be pushed apart in Harrisburg until the fall. This is the outcome that is unfortunate iGambling proponents after lawmakers in the Keystone State labored over gambling expansion legislation for the last several months.

At 12:01 am on July 12, Governor Tom Wolf (D) allowed a bipartisan budget plan to become law without their signature. The $31.5 billion spending blueprint shall increase paying for education and provide resources to combat hawaii’s heroin epidemic.

The primary issue is how to pay for it. Depending on who’s counting, the appropriations bill produces a $1-2 billion shortfall.

Mostly pushed by Republicans within the General Assembly, gambling expansion has been seen as one perfect untapped resource that could help pay for the program. However the legislature is anticipated to adjourn for the summer and perhaps not sometime reconvene until this autumn.

Gambling on Hold

Led by State Rep. John Payne (R-District 106), the gambling expansion in question could have authorized off-track betting facilities and airports to house slot machines, regulate daily fantasy sports (DFS), and legalize on line gambling.

Current casinos that are land-based be the only ones permitted to offer Web gambling. Licenses were expected to cost operators $8 million, with gross gaming revenues taxed at 16 percent.

‘Regulating and taxing interactive video gaming in Pennsylvania is a viable option that will benefit the state and our communities,’ Payne said in late June. ‘Before we ask the taxpayers to fork over more of their hard-earned money, we must consider revolutionary revenue sources to fill our budget shortfall and keep our public pension system solvent.’

Gambling certainly won’t overcome the gap that is billion-dollar however it would help.

Lawmakers estimate $100 million is produced for Harrisburg in the first 12 months alone largely due to upfront certification fees. Meaning five to 10 % for the budget gap could be solved through gambling expansion.

State leaders may also be targeting an extra $1 tax on each pack of cigarettes offered, imposing a six tax that is percent digital entertainment downloads, and overhauling the state-run wine industry to allow private merchants to enter the market.

Spend Now, Pay Later

Anyone with a credit card knows how important it really is to pay on time. Unfortunately for residents in Pennsylvania, their leaders that are electedn’t as economically versed.

State Sen. Pat Browne (R-District 16), chairman of the state’s Senate Appropriations Committee, says action will be forthcoming.

‘One hundred million dollars into the scope of a $31.5 billion budget . . . it isn’t required right away,’ Browne told the Philadelphia Inquirer. The Lehigh County senator included, nonetheless, that the likelihood of online gambling being reconsidered this fall are ‘probable.’

Wolf was justly upset that the General Assembly didn’t send him a way that is calculated pay because of its spending plan.

‘The General Assembly has a responsibility that is constitutional pass a sustainable revenue package to purchase what they desire to pay,’ Wolf stated this week. ‘We owe it to taxpayers, our kids, seniors, and our most susceptible to bring this across the finish line.’

Quebec ISP Blocking Challenged by Federal Customer Rights Group

Quebec’s plan to block online gambling web site faces a challenge that it is in direct conflict with federal law. (Image: gamingintelligence.com)

Quebec’s plans to force ISP’s to block access to unlicensed gambling is being put to the test by a federal customer rights team. The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) this week filed an objection to a law, passed by the Quebec legislature earlier in the year, which aims to disconnect 8.2 million residents from the unregulated markets.

The bill’s supporters claim that its aim is to ‘improve public health’ by forcing state residents to play on Quebec’s sole regulated online gaming site, Lotto-Quebec’s Espace-jeux.

But critics, which include net neutrality advocates, technology lawyers, therefore the ISPs themselves, have accused the Quebec government of establishing a precedent that is dangerous putting commercial gain above the freedom associated with internet. The plans, that have been drafted into the provinces March 2015 budget anticipate the scheme shall boost government revenues by $13.5 million in 2016-2017 and $27 million in subsequent years.

Expense to Consumers

These gains will come at the huge expense of ISP companies, which have stated that the interruption to their infrastructures is enormous as they would have to redesign their companies from the ground up. The price of this is passed onto consumers.

The PIAC filing states that Quebec is bondibet casino online in direct conflict with the1993 Federal Telecommunications Act, which prohibits a communications provider from ‘control[ing] the content or influence[ing] the meaning or reason for telecommunications carried by it for the public,’ unless it’s approval from the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission.